Writing for Boys -- Take the Quiz!
I have a son who is learning to read. I want to write stories that will be of
interest and value to him. I know the
values that I believe are universal to sentient beings, but are there elements which are particularly attractive
to the little boy goobers out there?
I have three of them, and I’ve gotta admit, they are vocal about what they like and don’t like. An awful lot of the time, that appears to be: cars, trains, robots, sharks, dinosaurs, soldiers, blowing things up, the color blue, and anything totally gross—boogers and farts.
But they also love: cute baby animals, mermaids, kittens, puppies, frogs, ants, science, paleontology, stories that “aren’t TOO scary”, bad guys who turn out to be good guys, singing and dancing, rainbows and anything with chocolate.
What about older boys? What do they like to read? Harry Potter, of course… remember how delighted everyone was at the thought that thanks to Harry Potter ten year old boys were actually reading books? One of the concerns of teachers is that it’s harder to get boys to read than girls throughout most of the academic ladder—including up to college.
What makes a book masculine-friendly? I asked my husband and he said BFGs and T&A. Thanks, sweetheart. ;) Kids cartoons have everything color-coded quite maniacally. But young adult and adult books really aren’t much different. You can tell from the cover which demographic the book is aimed at.
The feminist in me always feels guilty if I “cave in” to gender stereotypes. It would be nice if stories could transcend that kind of straightjacket, wouldn’t it?
But what if by getting so obsessed with the trappings of the story,we’re actually making the same mistake of judging things by the outer appearance and not the inner essence of the story? A while ago, Lego came out with Lego Friends: super cute Lego girls and Legos that came in pink and lilac and aquamarine. (Squeeee!!!! They are so awesome!!!!!) Inevitably, some people came and chewed out Lego for being sexist.
The shiny things that attract that atavistic part of ourselves probably is different in girls than boys. I remember reading some mind-boggling study that said there may be a biological reason most girls like pink better than
most boys—most females have more red receptors in their eyes than most males.
Holy cow. Here I was, blaming Matel. I don’t know about you, but that blew my mind. It also made me think that well-intentioned feminist parents who won’t let their daughters wear pink princess dresses are really missing the point.
If there really is a biological base for the love of pink, then it isn’t much more sexist to have a dearth of pink Legos?
The fear is that it’s all a slippery slope. Once you admit that pink might be rooted in biology, then you’ve as good as tied an apron around your daughter’s waist and chained her in the kitchen.
Or… maybe we could consider another possibility. Just because some primitive parts of ourselves, the inner cave people, are sexist, doesn’t mean that the best and most cherished parts of our minds are as well. The values that men and women are most likely to share equally also happen to be the highest values of our humanity: friendship, loyalty, courage, intelligence, love….
Now for the quiz!
Can you guess whether the following stories are aimed at boys or girls? I’ll give you just a few clues.
STORY 1: Pink. Ponies. Designing hats.
STORY 2: Trucks. Killer robot. Wrist device shooting green slime.
STORY 3: MC promises wants to do something. Although friends offer to help, MC is too proud to accept help. Finally, after MC is literally stuck, accepts help from friends and realizes there’s no shame in it.
STORY 4: MC and group of friends decide to race. MC is so busy trying to win that begins to lose friendship. Then a friend gets hurt and MC realizes friends are more important than winning.
Have you written down your answers yet?
It probably wasn’t too hard to guess that Story 1 was aimed at girls, and Story 2 was aimed at boys. But what about Story 3 and Story 4? It wasn’t as obvious, was it?
Why is that?
The clues from Story 1 and Story 2 were all about the out trappings of the story: the colors, the creatures, the goo. The clues from Story 3 and Story 4 were about values. Unless you knew that Story 4 involved pink ponies and Story 3 involved blue trucks, you’d never know one was targeted at girls and the other at boys. In fact, you could reverse the plots but keep the color schemes, and superficially, the entire demographic of the story would change.
But what do you think? What makes a book more appealing to boys or girls? Do you think men and women are more or less open to reading omnivorously?
image: Pink Sherbert Photography
I have three of them, and I’ve gotta admit, they are vocal about what they like and don’t like. An awful lot of the time, that appears to be: cars, trains, robots, sharks, dinosaurs, soldiers, blowing things up, the color blue, and anything totally gross—boogers and farts.
But they also love: cute baby animals, mermaids, kittens, puppies, frogs, ants, science, paleontology, stories that “aren’t TOO scary”, bad guys who turn out to be good guys, singing and dancing, rainbows and anything with chocolate.
What about older boys? What do they like to read? Harry Potter, of course… remember how delighted everyone was at the thought that thanks to Harry Potter ten year old boys were actually reading books? One of the concerns of teachers is that it’s harder to get boys to read than girls throughout most of the academic ladder—including up to college.
What makes a book masculine-friendly? I asked my husband and he said BFGs and T&A. Thanks, sweetheart. ;) Kids cartoons have everything color-coded quite maniacally. But young adult and adult books really aren’t much different. You can tell from the cover which demographic the book is aimed at.
The feminist in me always feels guilty if I “cave in” to gender stereotypes. It would be nice if stories could transcend that kind of straightjacket, wouldn’t it?
But what if by getting so obsessed with the trappings of the story,we’re actually making the same mistake of judging things by the outer appearance and not the inner essence of the story? A while ago, Lego came out with Lego Friends: super cute Lego girls and Legos that came in pink and lilac and aquamarine. (Squeeee!!!! They are so awesome!!!!!) Inevitably, some people came and chewed out Lego for being sexist.
The shiny things that attract that atavistic part of ourselves probably is different in girls than boys. I remember reading some mind-boggling study that said there may be a biological reason most girls like pink better than
most boys—most females have more red receptors in their eyes than most males.
Holy cow. Here I was, blaming Matel. I don’t know about you, but that blew my mind. It also made me think that well-intentioned feminist parents who won’t let their daughters wear pink princess dresses are really missing the point.
If there really is a biological base for the love of pink, then it isn’t much more sexist to have a dearth of pink Legos?
The fear is that it’s all a slippery slope. Once you admit that pink might be rooted in biology, then you’ve as good as tied an apron around your daughter’s waist and chained her in the kitchen.
Or… maybe we could consider another possibility. Just because some primitive parts of ourselves, the inner cave people, are sexist, doesn’t mean that the best and most cherished parts of our minds are as well. The values that men and women are most likely to share equally also happen to be the highest values of our humanity: friendship, loyalty, courage, intelligence, love….
Now for the quiz!
Can you guess whether the following stories are aimed at boys or girls? I’ll give you just a few clues.
STORY 1: Pink. Ponies. Designing hats.
STORY 2: Trucks. Killer robot. Wrist device shooting green slime.
STORY 3: MC promises wants to do something. Although friends offer to help, MC is too proud to accept help. Finally, after MC is literally stuck, accepts help from friends and realizes there’s no shame in it.
STORY 4: MC and group of friends decide to race. MC is so busy trying to win that begins to lose friendship. Then a friend gets hurt and MC realizes friends are more important than winning.
Have you written down your answers yet?
It probably wasn’t too hard to guess that Story 1 was aimed at girls, and Story 2 was aimed at boys. But what about Story 3 and Story 4? It wasn’t as obvious, was it?
Why is that?
The clues from Story 1 and Story 2 were all about the out trappings of the story: the colors, the creatures, the goo. The clues from Story 3 and Story 4 were about values. Unless you knew that Story 4 involved pink ponies and Story 3 involved blue trucks, you’d never know one was targeted at girls and the other at boys. In fact, you could reverse the plots but keep the color schemes, and superficially, the entire demographic of the story would change.
But what do you think? What makes a book more appealing to boys or girls? Do you think men and women are more or less open to reading omnivorously?
Comments
I think the book market for boys is self-correcting and right now boys are opting out of the bullshit people are trying to cram down their throats.
Boys and teen boys check out of the market with amazing ease. Role-playing games like Skyrim and other video games fill their storytelling needs when they can’t turn to books because of the lack of content.
Now, there are books out there aimed specifically for boys, and books not particularly aimed at either sex like Harry Potter and Hunger Games. And at a certain point, a young man simply checks out of the book market for his age group and reads adult-market books despite the fact he may be only 13 to 18.
So, in a sense, this really isn’t a problem that I’m up in arms about. My oldest likes to read Robert Heinlein and Larry Correia.
But it is a problem for people who try to make money on books for boys. These people often give up and say things like “boys don’t read” or some other illogical argument that everyone knows is false. Boys do read. They just aren’t reading the (crap) that you’re selling.
What makes a book more appealing to boys:
**A forward-focused story where the main character is not dwelling in the past
**Where boys and men are in the story, some of them exhibit positive masculine behavior (yes, boys don’t like men-hating books just like men don’t)
**Lack of pretentious message fiction (boys can spot this a mile away and attribute it to “boring”)
**A lack of passive-aggressive behavior on the main character’s part (this is huge and many women authors boof this consistently)
**Related, a main character that does things, rather than reacts to things and tries to do them in a positive, heroic manner
**A cover that takes into account how boys visualize (I once showed a book to my oldest and he looked at the cover and snorted “What, is this this Twilight for boys?”)
What makes a book more appealing to girls:
I think the current book market does this well. But I see a lot of disingenuous arguments made that these books should also magically appeal to boys and if they don’t, it’s the parents fault for raising their boys wrong.
No joke. There is on several blogs that make this assertion.
Do you think men and women are more or less open to reading omnivorously:
Yes, when they want to do so. Tara, in your books, you have some male characters that are a “mans’ man.” This is appealing beyond, say, the alpha male portrayed in a romance novel sweeping the heroine off her feet. Not that there is anything wrong with that; it just not what attracts men to read.
The “mans’ man” character has universal appeal but isn’t easy to portray. There are other common elements out there, besides this that appeals to all genders (for example, boobs. Boobs have universal appeal).
But, the bottom line with books for boys is an untapped market that will slowly be filled by independent sources or other hybrid story platforms besides books (like story-telling video games). The landscape is currently bleak here. I’ve been following the publishing industry for several years now and many people within, all the way from writers to book buyers wouldn’t know, for example, a Christian-valued man if he bit them on their ass. The disconnect is legion and forced by ideology and dogma. The market here is wide open.
I once asked a group of women writers who were talking about writing books for boys if they ever played Halo. They all said no.
Then what makes you think you understand what boys want in a story? I asked. If you are unwilling to explore the popular storytelling mediums out there already in use, why would you think your book would be appealing?
I have yet to have someone give me an answer on that one.