Tara Maya's Tales

The most important factor in a story that keeps readers reading is putting a good character in peril.  The danger doesn't have to be physical. It could be emotional, financial, social, spiritual...  but there has to be tension in the story. The reader thinks that they want the tension relieved, but actually, if the tension drops off, the reader grows bored.  Yet sometimes, the writer, in a fit of misplaced pity for the character, forgets this cardinal rule, and tries to relieve tension for the character (reader), inadvertently killing the story tension.  I've seen this done in a couple of ways. I'll list just three of them here, for now, and then suggest some remedies. Problem: The All-Awesome Main Character (a "Mary Sue" or "Marty Stew" This is the worst. If you have a character who's simply a stand-in for the fantasies of the author, to the point that this character never does wrong, is liked by everyone, wins every fight, develops new skills witho...

Today I read an article, "How To Think For Yourself, " by David Bather Woods, that discussed the belief of some philosophers that reading could make you stupider. (There are of course several layers of irony involved in such a proposition.) But this is an alternative to the view I suggested in my discussion about Sensitivity Readers, in which I suggested that reading creates bridge between minds, expanding our mental horizons rather than shortening them.  Still, let's see what the argument is, and see if it has any nugget of truth. Schopenhauer was very clear: ‘Reading is a mere surrogate for one’s own thinking’ and, for this reason, ‘erudition makes most people even more stupid and simple than they already are by nature’....Reading, he thinks, inserts ‘foreign and heterogeneous’ thoughts into our own, which never truly belong to us. Characteristically, Schopenhauer draws on a range of images to illustrate this point: reading is like ‘the seal to the wax on which it press...

This is the first I've heard of this as such a codified process. On Operation Awesome's blog , not too long ago, someone asked about "sensitivity readers." I'd never heard of them before. This was the answer: I know there is a lot of fear out there, particularly in kid lit, about sensitivity reads and cancel culture and how the "woke" love to pile on books, sometimes even before they are published for their perceived mis-representation of certain groups.  Is it any wonder that publishers, who hold the financial risk in this situation, are taking steps to mitigate that risk? A sensitivity reader is basically someone from a community represented in your story who isn't there to cancel you, but to ensure that the representation of that character is authentic.  For example, if you have a Taiwanese character in your story, your publisher may get a Taiwanese reader to do a sensitivity read to make sure the culture is represented in a realistic way. Obvious...

First of all, most Tiktok advice is pure trash; always take it with a grain of salt. Second, use the Golden Rule. Never do to someone else what you wouldn't want them to do to you. Is that so hard to figure out? Operation Awesome has another writer hit by the vile Tiktok inspired trend of returning author's books after reading them. What kind of person does this? Honestly, I know the economy is hitting people hard, but if you are a reader of mine and can't afford my books, email me (tara at taramayastales dot com) and simply ask for a free copy. I'll send it to you. But don't pretend to buy them, read them and then return them. That's creepy. (This is isn't happening to me right now, but it's the principle.) So, I admit, I was skeptical about this when I first heard about it, but the more I've heard, the more I understand why this is a problem. It seems to be a combination of two factors: one, scum on Tiktok urging people to take advantage of author...

I want to to like Rings of Power. I would love to love it. But I'm extremely skeptical.  Let me be clear... when I first heard that Peter Jackson was making movies about the Lord of the Rings, I was quite skeptical as well. Even then, I didn't trust Hollywood to do those books justice. I expected something half-assed, remotely related and ultimately rather hokey.  Instead, I was blown away by the movies.  This wasn't because the movies showed the books exactly as I imagined them. Frodo, for instance, was much more heroic and attractive than I had envisioned him... and, oh, my gosh, so much better. I loved that the love story of Aragon and Arwen was woven right into the story instead of stuffed into some appendix. Faramir, my favorite character from the book, was treated fairly, and everything else was beautifully brought to life as grandly or more grandly than I had imagined. Unlike some people who thought the Hobbit prequels were a let down, I enjoyed those very much. Ag...

I dislike five features of KU.  1) The worst feature, above all: KU is exclusive, even though it isn't even available globally. The advantage to Amazon is obvious. They keep readers in their own pool, chained off from rival sources of books.  But what is the advantage to writers? The writer surrenders power to the big shark for the right to swim in the same pool as the captive readers. And some writers find this lucrative, I don't deny it. Since for most writers making money is important, I sympathize, but to me this is only one step away from selling your rights to a big publisher. You sacrifice long term gain for short term gain--which is short-sighted. Also, I hate how unfair it is to readers who can't even read your books. I would have to literally deny books to some of my international fans--how sad. I've had fans of The Unfinished Song write to me from all over the world. It means so much to me to know that anyone can access my books.  2.) Two, Amazon decides how...

Warning: Spoilers In contrast to Green Snake, a movie with fantastic special effects but a terrible theme and vile heroine, today, I'd like to review a WWII war movie that didn't look as if it had much of a budget.  At times the dialogue was clunky, at times the pacing slow, and the special effects were certainly nothing special.  There have been plenty of WWII movies, so what made this one stand out? First of all, this was apparently one of three movies made called Saints and Soldiers. I happened to catch the second one, having not seen the first. This one was Saints and Soldiers: Airborne Creed. The movie revolves around three men. Some movie time  was spent focused on the backstory of a soldier who had a calling to become a pastor. In fact, his mentor tries to talk him out of entering the one, telling him that his calling to serve God is more important than fighting. The would-be pastor rejects this, deciding that at the moment that the most important thing for him to...